Domesticity in the Making of Modern Science by Donald L. Opitz, Staffan Bergwik, Brigitte Van Tiggelen
By Donald L. Opitz, Staffan Bergwik, Brigitte Van Tiggelen
The background of the trendy sciences has lengthy neglected the importance of domesticity as a actual, social, and symbolic strength within the shaping of data construction. This ebook offers a welcome reorientation to our realizing of the making of the trendy sciences globally by means of emphasizing the centrality of domesticity in assorted medical agencies.
Read Online or Download Domesticity in the Making of Modern Science PDF
Best modern books
A examine of the preferred smooth dramatists and the continuity of the farce culture from Pinero to Travers, the Whitehall workforce and Orton which examines and questions a number of the universal assumptions approximately its nature. Farce concepts are proven to be more and more utilized in severe drama.
Fiscal development calls for technological improvement, which in flip is determined by a country's social means to procure, assimilate, and enhance new applied sciences. concentrating on the evolution of Japan's economic climate from the Meiji recovery to the current day, this quantity offers an authoritative account, firmly grounded in theoretical and empirical research, of the country's makes an attempt to generate the mandatory social capability for technological innovation and absorption.
- Inside a Modern Macroeconometric Model: A Guide to the Murphy Model
- Advanced Applns of Rapid Prototyping Tech. in Modern Engineering
- Hegel's Dialectic of Desire and Recognition
- Symmetry & modern physics : Yang Retirement Symposium : State University of New York, Stony Brook, 21-22 May 1999
Additional info for Domesticity in the Making of Modern Science
22. McClain, Beaufort, pp. 118–20. 23. According to Chambers, she started collecting in the 1690s: Chambers, ‘Storys’, p. 49. She began growing herbs and plants in her garden to make homeopathic medicines, her recipes for which have also survived: McClain, Beaufort, p. 118. 24. This work was published in three versions: J. Glanvill (1670) The Way of Happiness Represented in its Difﬁculties and Incouragements, and Cleared from Many Popular and Dangerous Mistakes (London: James Collins/London: Gedeon Schaw).
On Mary’s reclusive tendencies, see McClain, Beaufort, p. 118. S. Brown and J. Petiver (1701) ‘An Account of Part of a Collection of Curious Plants and Drugs, Lately Given to the Royal Society by the East India Company’, Philosophical Transactions, 22, 579–94: 579; M. Somerset, list of seeds received from Mrs. 130–1; M. 273; M. Somerset to H. 23. J. Bobart to M. 37. Some of the results of these activities are listed in M. 120–1. The ﬁndings of this experiment are then reported in Brown and Petiver, ‘An Account’, p.
The exact dates of Sherard’s employment are not given, but he is clearly in Mary Somerset’s employ on 21 September 1700 when he writes to a colleague on her behalf: W. 44. See Julie Davies 35. 36. 37. 38. 39. 40. 41. 42. 43. 44. 45. 46. 47. 48. 49. 50. 51. 37 also J. Dandy (1958) The Sloane Herbarium (London: Trustees of the British Museum), p. 210. McClain, Beaufort, p. 211; Series of letters from M. Somerset to H. 3, 5, 7, and 9. M. Somerset to H. 1. W. 44. The correspondent was likely James Petiver, FRS, a London apothecary.