Language, Logic and Epistemology: A Modal-Realist Approach by Christopher Norris (auth.)
By Christopher Norris (auth.)
Read Online or Download Language, Logic and Epistemology: A Modal-Realist Approach PDF
Best postmodernism books
In Japan, obsessive grownup lovers and creditors of manga and anime are referred to as otaku. while the underground otaku lifestyle first emerged within the Seventies, individuals have been appeared down on inside of mainstream jap society as unusual, delinquent loners. at the present time otaku have had a huge effect on pop culture not just in Japan but additionally all through Asia, Europe, and the us.
The participants to this assortment supply an important advent to the ways that feminist linguistics and demanding discourse research have contributed to our knowing of gender and intercourse. by means of reading how those views were utilized to those innovations, the participants offer either a evaluate of the literature, in addition to a chance to stick to the latest debates during this region.
Tendencies IN LINGUISTICS is a chain of books that open new views in our knowing of language. The sequence publishes state of the art paintings on middle components of linguistics throughout theoretical frameworks in addition to reports that offer new insights by means of development bridges to neighbouring fields comparable to neuroscience and cognitive technological know-how.
- Postmodernism and Popular Culture
- Reclaiming Identity: Realist Theory and the Predicament of Postmodernism
- Cardinal Numbers: Stories
Extra resources for Language, Logic and Epistemology: A Modal-Realist Approach
Thus, for Derrida, the most remarkable feature of Austin’s discourse consists in his acknowledging that the possibility of the negative (in this case, of infelicities) is in fact a structural possibility, that failure is an essential risk of the operation under consideration; then, in a move which is almost immediately simultaneous, in the name of a kind of ideal regulation, it excludes that risk as accidental, exterior, one which teaches us nothing about the linguistic phenomenon being considered.
That is to say, what Derrida shares with early Davidson is the belief that interpretation cannot even make a start except on the premise that linguistic understanding is primarily a matter of the logical resources that alone make it possible for speech-acts or texts to communicate across otherwise unbridgeable differences of language, culture, social context, background presupposition, and so forth. Early Davidson sets these conditions out in the form of a Tarskian (truth-based) formal semantics which – as he 38 Language, Logic and Epistemology argues – can then be extended to natural languages by way of those various logical constants in the absence of which they would fail to qualify as ‘languages’, properly speaking.
All the same – as I have said – their thinking has more in common than might appear from this face-value characterisation. For with Derrida also the main point of interest is not so much the ambiguity (or semantic overdetermination) of a word like ‘supplement’ in isolated instances of usage but rather the logic of supplementarity as revealed through a mode of conceptual exegesis that scarcely conforms to accepted models of textual or thematic exegesis. ’, just as the semantical case for paradigm-relativism makes much of the fact that the language of certain nomadic farmers picks out manifold shades of ‘green’, or that Eskimo language has many different words for ‘white’.