Žižek and Heidegger : the question concerning by Thomas Brockelman
By Thomas Brockelman
Žižek and Heidegger deals a thorough new interpretation of the paintings of Slavoj Žižek, one of many world's top modern thinkers, via a research of his courting with the paintings of Martin Heidegger. Thomas Brockelman argues that Žižek's oeuvre is essentially a reaction to Heidegger's philosophy of finitude, an immanent critique of it which attracts it towards innovative praxis. Brockelman additionally unearths obstacles in Žižek's courting with Heidegger, in particular in his ambivalence approximately Heidegger's techno-phobia. Brockelman's critique of Žižek departs from this ambivalence - a basic pressure in Žižek's paintings among a historicist severe thought of techno-capitalism and an anti-historicist thought of progressive switch. as well as clarifying what Žižek has to claim approximately our global and concerning the probability of radical switch in it, Žižek and Heidegger explores a number of the ways that this break up on the middle of his proposal appears to be like inside of it - in Žižek's perspectives on historical past or at the dating among the progressive chief and the proletariat or among the analyst and the analysand.
Read or Download Žižek and Heidegger : the question concerning techno-capitalism PDF
Best modern books
A examine of the preferred glossy dramatists and the continuity of the farce culture from Pinero to Travers, the Whitehall group and Orton which examines and questions a number of the universal assumptions approximately its nature. Farce options are proven to be more and more utilized in severe drama.
Financial development calls for technological improvement, which in flip will depend on a country's social means to obtain, assimilate, and boost new applied sciences. concentrating on the evolution of Japan's financial system from the Meiji recovery to the current day, this quantity offers an authoritative account, firmly grounded in theoretical and empirical research, of the country's makes an attempt to generate the mandatory social potential for technological innovation and absorption.
- A Companion to Multiconfessionalism in the Early Modern World(Hardback) - 2011 Edition
- Six Lectures on Modern Natural Philosophy
- The impossible mourning of Jacques Derrida, 1st Edition
- Modern Elementary Particle Physics - The Fundamental Particles and Fields (updated edn)
- Observatories and Telescopes of Modern Times: Ground-Based Optical and Radio Astronomy Facilities since 1945
- Victorian Time: Technologies, Standardizations, Catastrophes (Palgrave Studies in Nineteenth-Century Writing and Culture)
Additional info for Žižek and Heidegger : the question concerning techno-capitalism
If you like, Žižek raises and fails to answer the question of the relationship between capitalism and technological productivism: but that relationship is precisely what his various efforts to come to terms with contemporary technology amount to. Given his obvious concern with this issue, why both raise the issue and fail to respond to it? Most obviously Žižek doesn’t say more about techno-capitalism in that opening passage of The Ticklish Subject because what he has to say doesn’t fit the polemic he constructs about postmodernism and the modern subject.
So, on the one hand, I want to suggest that Žižek’s list of rhetorical questions at the beginning of The Ticklish Subject includes the actual (nonrhetorical, non-polemical) question of techno-capitalism precisely because he feels the demand for a univocal thesis like Heidegger’s, the demand for 28 Žižek and Heidegger: The Question Concerning Techno-Capitalism a definitive answer to the question of modernity’s status and value. On the other hand, his work demonstrates that precisely this question evades such resolution.
He suggests an emblematic photograph for our time, a press image from 1997 of indigenous Borneans attempting to put out an enormous forest fire, a fire that indirectly was caused by global warming and the resultant El Ninõ effect. What strikes Žižek about the image is the mismatch of scale indicated by tribesmen passing small plastic bags of water with which they vainly strive to put out a blaze whose smoke plume covers “the entire area of northern Indonesia, Malaysia and the southern Philippines” (Žižek 1999a, p.